Blog
Let's keep the creation of wealth as a bit of a mystery for now. What we know is that when people get together to meet each other's needs in a mutual way, a surplus is generated and the system comes to raise the living standards of everyone in it.
There are two directions I want to go from there. The first is that if we want to use money to facilitate the exchanges involved, there is no reason for such a body of people not to create the exact amount of money they need to do so, and this costs essentially nothing.
The second is that as the system gets larger, each person needs to be able to tell what to create for others that is particularly valuable or a particularly good use of their talents. This is simply an information system that transmits how much value people are finding in products and services. Money and prices play this role but are not necessary to it.
I pay careful attention to the use of the word wealth in the FT and the Economist. It seems always to mean a serious stash of money.
Why would anybody use a serious word so carelessly?
Wikipedia does far better : Wealth derives from the old English word "weal", which means "well-being." The term was originally an adjective to describe the possession of great qualities.
Or Wiktionary: Weal; welfare; prosperity; good; well-being; happiness; joy; Riches; valuable material possessions; A great amount; an abundance or plenty; Power, of the kind associated with a great deal of money.
The last gives us the depleted meaning at the end.
This is not a trivial problem because the abuse of power to control the creation of money has substantially destroyed our democratic institutions, thus undermining the real meaning of wealth.
